Multi Ping batch file script
commandsThis script will help you a lot
copy this all script in a notepad
save as
And create a computers.txt text document in c:\ ( C drive)
Here give required IP address in computers.txt file
Like
Now You can ping and check the status N number of ip's at a time.
open ping.bat file which is saved on desktop
Its going to ping all ips and open a new log file with the status of all ip's
Its really helpful to system and network administrators.
@echo off (Set InputFile=c:\Computers.txt) title,Pinging list of computers &color 9e ::datestamp for /f "tokens=2-4 skip=1 delims=(-./)" %%i in ('echo.^|date') do ( for /f "tokens=1-4 delims=-./ " %%m in ('date /t') do ( (set dow=%%m)&(set %%i=%%n)&(set %%j=%%o)&(set yy=%%p) ) ) For /F "tokens=1,2 delims=:, " %%i in ('TIME /T') Do (Set HHMM=%%i%%j) (Set OutputFile=c:\Pinglog %yy%-%mm%-%dd% %HHMM%.txt) If Exist "%OutputFile%" Del "%OutputFile%" For /F "eol=;" %%* in ('type "%InputFile%"') do ( >>"%OutputFile%" (echo.&echo.---------------&( echo.%%*;&(ping -a -n 2 -w 750 %%* | Find ".")) )&echo.done %%*,) ::check start notepad.exe %OutputFile%
Creating a batch file for simple ping command to an ip
BatchCopy below text in notepad
echo off
echo.
cls
color 5e
echo.
echo.
echo.
echo.
echo ********** ISDN **********
echo.
echo.
ping 192.168.1.1 -t -l 4
echo.
echo.
echo.
echo.
pause
COLOR
ECHO ON
EXIT
Replace the ip address which you want to ping
This text file save as
RAID 5 overview
RAIDRAID 5 is a method of spreading volume data across multiple disk drives. The DS6000™ series supports RAID 5 arrays.
RAID 5 increases performance by supporting concurrent accesses to the multiple DDMs within each logical volume. Data protection is provided by parity, which is stored throughout the drives in the array. If a drive fails, the data on that drive can be restored using all the other drives in the array along with the parity bits that were created when the data was stored.
One of the most popular RAID levels, RAID 5 stripes both data and parity information across three or more drives. It is similar to RAID 4 except that it exchanges the dedicated parity drive for a distributed parity algorithm, writing data and parity blocks across all the drives in the array. This removes the "bottleneck" that the dedicated parity drive represents, improving write performance slightly and allowing somewhat better parallelism in a multiple-transaction environment, though the overhead necessary in dealing with the parity continues to bog down writes. Fault tolerance is maintained by ensuring that the parity information for any given block of data is placed on a drive separate from those used to store the data itself. The performance of a RAID 5 array can be "adjusted" by trying different stripe sizes until one is found that is well-matched to the application being used.
This illustration shows how files of different sizes are distributed |
Controller Requirements: Requires a moderately high-end card for hardware RAID; supported by some operating systems for software RAID, but at a substantial performance penalty.
Hard Disk Requirements: Minimum of three standard hard disks; maximum set by controller. Should be of identical size and type.
Array Capacity: (Size of Smallest Drive) * (Number of Drives - 1).
Storage Efficiency: If all drives are the same size, ( (Number of Drives - 1) / Number of Drives).
Fault Tolerance: Good. Can tolerate loss of one drive.
Availability: Good to very good. Hot sparing and automatic rebuild are usually featured on hardware RAID controllers supporting RAID 5 (software RAID 5 will require down-time).
Degradation and Rebuilding: Due to distributed parity, degradation can be substantial after a failure and during rebuilding.
Random Read Performance: Very good to excellent; generally better for larger stripe sizes. Can be better than RAID 0 since the data is distributed over one additional drive, and the parity information is not required during normal reads.
Random Write Performance: Only fair, due to parity overhead; this is improved over RAID 3 and RAID 4 due to eliminating the dedicated parity drive, but the overhead is still substantial.
Sequential Read Performance: Good to very good; generally better for smaller stripe sizes.
Sequential Write Performance: Fair to good.
Cost: Moderate, but often less than that of RAID 3 or RAID 4 due to its greater popularity, and especially if software RAID is used.
Special Considerations: Due to the amount of parity calculating required, software RAID 5 can seriously slow down a system. Performance will depend to some extent upon the stripe size chosen.
Recommended Uses: RAID 5 is seen by many as the ideal combination of good performance, good fault tolerance and high capacity and storage efficiency. It is best suited for transaction processing and is often used for "general purpose" service, as well as for relational database applications, enterprise resource planning and other business systems. For write-intensive applications, RAID 1 or RAID 1+0 are probably better choices (albeit higher in terms of hardware cost), as the performance of RAID 5 will begin to substantially decrease in a write-heavy environment.
RAID 10 overview
RAIDRAID 10 provides high availability by combining features of RAID 0 and RAID 1. The DS6000™ series supports RAID 10 arrays.
RAID 0 increases performance by striping volume data across multiple disk drives. RAID 1 provides disk mirroring which duplicates data between two disk drives. By combining the features of RAID 0 and RAID 1, RAID 10 provides a second optimization for fault tolerance.
RAID 10 implementation provides data mirroring from one DDM to another DDM. RAID 10 stripes data across half of the disk drives in the RAID 10 configuration. The other half of the array mirrors the first set of disk drives. Access to data is preserved if one disk in each mirrored pair remains available. In some cases, RAID 10 offers faster data reads and writes than RAID 5 because it does not need to manage parity. However, with half of the DDMs in the group used for data and the other half used to mirror that data, RAID 10 disk groups have less capacity than RAID 5 disk groups